First up, check out Macrodesiac partner Syscoin ๐Ÿ‘‡

Build the future on Syscoin: The best of Bitcoin and Ethereum in one place

This has started doing the rounds again lately. ๐Ÿ‘‡

The 2000s housing bubble was greatly exaggerated
Almost everyone misunderstood the housing boomโ€”including the Federal Reserve.

Here's the rub: If we're not in a housing bubble now even though prices are going up, maybe we weren't in a housing bubble in the 2000's and it was just a housing shortage after all. Who knew, right? ๐Ÿ‘‡

And yet not very many people think weโ€™re in the middle of a second housing bubble. Rather, most experts believe that todayโ€™s housing prices reflect โ€œfundamentalโ€ factors.
Interest rates are at all-time lows, giving homebuyers more spending power.
And regulatory restrictions have created housing shortages in many metropolitan areas.
But that leads to a question that at first glance might seem crazy: what if those same explanations largely explain the housing boom that peaked in 2006?
What if the big problem in the early 2000s wasnโ€™t an excess of houses but a shortage of them?

I'm trying to play nice. So if you believe that the housing bubble was "just under-supply", we can still be friends, but only if I can remind you of your wrongness every day.

Seriously, something we're always doing in the Premium community is adding context to make sense of an increasingly noisy world. For example... ย 

There's more to a bubble than prices

Why's it different this time?

Leverage & lending standards

Back in the boom times, anyone could get a mortgage. House prices only went up, so if you could make the repayment, you got a mortgage.

If you couldn't make the repayment, you just sold for a profit because the house would've gone up in value. Easy.

100% mortgages were easy to get. In Spain, they were literally throwing money at anyone with a job.

Even 120% mortgages were common. 100% finance for the house. Oh and here's some extra for the taxes & furnishings.
Buy a car or take a holiday with whatever 's left over.

Here's the kicker. Make the payments for six months, and you could do it again. And again, and again.

The stripper scene in the Big Short (don't open the link at work ๐Ÿ‘€) was typical where I worked in Spain, only it wasn't just strippers. It was everyone.

We spoke about the housing market this morning. That video will be up on the YouTube Channel soon. Hit subscribe to get notified when it drops ๐Ÿ‘‡

Strippers and barmen taking out six mortgages isn't what's happening now

Bill McBride has a great thread covering the details & differences here ๐Ÿ‘‡

He adds that:

โ€œA bubble requires both overvaluation based on fundamentals and speculation. It is natural to focus on an assetโ€™s fundamental value, but the real key for detecting a bubble is speculation.โ€

For me, it's also about leverage in speculation. When everyone goes 'all-in' on a sure thing, you know it's going to end badly. ย  ย 

Now, even though it isn't a bubble, nobody's saying that the current housing market is healthy.

Housing is increasingly unaffordable, especially for those not already on the ladder. Interest rates are now increasing along with the cost of living, both due to inflation.

Some kind of mean reversion in prices looks inevitable, a matter of when rather than if.

In the UK, the Bank of England is looking to relax affordability rules.

Bank of England could relax mortgage affordability tests
The Bank of England is considering ditching rules that limit how much people can financially stretch themselves when taking out mortgages.

These are a limit on the loan-to-income limit and an affordability test, which specifies a stress interest rate for lenders when assessing peoples' ability to repay a mortgage.
The loan-to-income-ratio is the multiple at which banks will lend based on your annual salary.
Since 2014, banks have had a limit on the number of mortgages they can offer where someone is borrowing more than 4.5 times their salary.
There is also an additional affordability test, which means borrowers must prove they can still afford their mortgage repayments if these were to increase to 3 per cent above their lender's standard variable rate.

For now, it's just a consultation (which will end on May 6th 2022).

Banks are already tightening lending standards unilaterally so there's no guarantee that any change in the regulations would have too much effect right now.

In the future however...

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
~George Santayana

David was on top-form for the all-in podcast. ICYMI ๐Ÿ‘‡

Don't know what financial news stories are important and what's complete bullsh*t? Hop onto our filtered news channel.

It's completely free ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and stay up to date with all of our videos as they're posted. We'll keep expanding and adding more formats as we go!

Check out our reviews on TrustPilot ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

Macrodesiac is rated โ€œExcellentโ€ with 4.6 / 5 on Trustpilot
Do you agree with Macrodesiac โ€™s TrustScore? Voice your opinion today and hear what 70 customers have already said.